Scores of Bodies are Found in Syrian Town after ISIS Retreats

BEIRUT, Lebanon — As pro-government troops drove Islamic State fighters from a central Syrian town over the weekend, the retreating militants killed scores of civilians, dumping some bodies into wells and leaving others in the street, local residents and the Syrian state-run news media said on Monday.
The apparent mass killing is the latest example of the brutal reprisals that have taken place when territory changes hands in Syria’s multisided war, with civilians often bearing the brunt of the pain.
The carnage showed how the Islamic State can still spread havoc even as it loses major parts of its territory that once included large areas of Syria and Iraq.
At least 67 bodies had been identified in the town, Qaryatayn, northeast of Damascus, the capital, by Monday afternoon, according to local activists who posted an online list of the victims’ names.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which monitors the conflict, said that as many as 128 civilians had been killed in Qaryatayn in the past several weeks before the Islamic State fighters retreated.
The militants had accused the victims of collaborating with the government, according to residents, who disputed that claim. Local residents said the dead appeared to include many townspeople who had tried to keep their heads down as the town changed hands several times in recent years.
“I knew most of these people — farmers and electricians and teachers,” said Abdullah Abdulkarim, a resident and citizen journalist who fled to the northern province of Aleppo a few years ago but keeps in close touch with contacts in Qaryatayn.
Mr. Abdulkarim said that the youngest victim was in his teens and the oldest was 57, adding, “Some of the bodies were dumped in wells, which makes it harder to find them.”
Several were members of his extended family, he said, including five of his father’s cousins, one of whom was a local mukhtar, or leader. “They were all shot and left on the streets for others to take as an example,” he said. “They all were accused of collaborating with the regime.”
Qaryatayn, like many places in Syria, has been through many phases of war. Local youths formed makeshift rebel groups early in the uprising, which began in 2011 after the government cracked down violently on largely peaceful political protests.
The groups withdrew in late 2013 to spare the town from the government shelling that had befallen many rebel-held areas; Mr. Abdelkarim, an online advocate for the rebels, fled with them to rebel-held areas farther north.
The government held the town until 2015, when the Islamic State seized it, destroying a 15th-century monastery and prompting thousands of Christians to flee. The town changed hands several more times, with Islamic State fighters seizing it again in late September and the government retaking it last weekend.
_______________________________________________________________
Works Cited
Barnard, Anne. “Scores of Bodies Are Found in Syrian Town After ISIS Retreats.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 23 Oct. 2017, <www.nytimes.com/2017/10/23/world/middleeast/syria-isis-mass-killing.html>.
_______________________________________________________________
Response
This article appears to be directed towards a largely educated population of citizens in the US and most likely in New York as this was published by the New York Times. The audience is also most likely middle aged whites who tend to be more of the racist crowd and would be further angered against Muslims because of the ISIS's actions. 
This article is clearly biased against the ISIS depicting vividly and gruesomely the deaths caused by the ISIS without proposing any possible motives for the ISIS or really explaining why all the killings happened. 
As a reader, I was also biased against the ISIS as I knew of the many other acts caused by the ISIS I was not surprised to hear that they had killed even more people and so the title of the article fit perfectly into my expectations for what the ISIS would have done. 
As the unrest in the Middle East continues it becomes clear that something must be done. What is unclear is who should do the 'doing' as this clearly has been the cause of much in the violence in the past several of years. ISIS thinks they should do the 'doing' so they attack, take over and rule for a time. Then the government thinks they should do the 'doing' so they push out the ISIS and rule for a time. But ultimately this just results in a endless cycle of one group pushing out another. The difficulty is figuring out who should act then. Should it be the UN? or another government? And how does this group go about resolving the issues and restoring peace without just killing more civilians?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

South Korea, China seek to med relations after THAAD fallout

First Article

About Me