Investigative Journalist in Malta is Killed in Car Bombing

An investigative journalist in Malta who exposed her island nation’s links to offshore tax havens using the leaked Panama Papers was killed in a car bombing on Monday, an attack that shocked Malta and was condemned by leaders of the European Union.
The journalist, Daphne Caruana Galizia, 53, died when the car she was driving exploded in Bidnija, a hamlet in north-central Malta. Her final blog post, accusing the prime minister’s chief of staff of corruption, had been published about a half-hour earlier.
Ms. Caruana Galizia ran a blog that was so popular and influential that it helped cause a political crisis when she accused Prime Minister Joseph Muscat’s wife of benefiting from a secret Panamanian shell company that was used to deposit unexplained payments from Azerbaijan’s ruling family. Mr. Muscat, who has denied wrongdoing, called a snap election in June, which his Labour Party won, giving him a second term.
In a statement on Monday, Mr. Muscat said he was shocked by the killing.
“I condemn without reservations this barbaric attack on a person and on the freedom of expression in our country,” he said in a statement. “Everyone is aware that Ms. Caruana Galizia was one of my harshest critics, politically and personally, as she was for others too. However, I can never use, in any way, this fact to justify, in any possible way, this barbaric act that goes against civilization and all dignity.”
Mr. Muscat said the national police and security forces had been instructed “to take every step necessary in the investigations” to find whoever was responsible.
The leader of the opposition, Adrian Delia, warned of “the collapse of democracy and freedom of expression,” and said on Twitter: “We shall not be silenced.”
Another opposition lawmaker, Simon Busuttil, warned on Twitter: “The rule of law has collapsed. Our democracy is at stake.”
Numerous officials condemned the killing. “If journalists are silenced, our freedom is lost,” said Frans Timmermans, the first vice president of the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union.


Antonio Tajani, the president of the European Parliament, said that Ms. Caruana Galizia had “sacrificed her life to seek out the truth.”


Ms. Caruana Galizia started her journalism career in 1987 as a columnist for The Sunday Times of Malta, but she was best known in recent years for her influential blog, called Running Commentary, which frequently leveled accusations against powerful politicians and business executives. Her final blog post called the prime minister’s chief of staff “a crook” and warned: “There are crooks everywhere you look now. The situation is desperate.”


The European edition of Politico, the online news site, recently included Ms. Caruana Galizia on a list of 28 people who are “shaping, shaking and stirring Europe.” The news site called her a “blogging fury” and a “one-woman WikiLeaks” bent on exposing corruption and nepotism.
In February, Ms. Caruana Galizia wrote that the country’s economy minister and an ally had sued her for libel, and gotten her accounts frozen, after she accused them of visiting a brothel in Germany while on official government business.
The Times of Malta reported that Ms. Caruana Galizia had filed a police report about two weeks ago about threats that she had received.
Prime Minister Muscat called on the country to defend democracy and the rule of law.
“In this moment of profound sentiment, I am appealing for national unity,” he said in his statement. “This is not the time to discuss the conduct of a person. Everyone has the right to write and say what they want in this country, and those who feel wronged are entitled to protection by the courts and no other remedy.”
He vowed: “I will not rest until justice is delivered in this case, as our country deserves justice.”
Gerard Ryle, the director of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, which organized the Panama Papers investigation, said it was “deeply concerned about freedom of the press in Malta” and urged the authorities to investigate the killing. One of the victim’s three sons, Matthew Caruana Galizia, works for the organization as a developer and data journalist.
Ms. Caruana Galizia, who is also survived by her husband, had been a staunch advocate for the European Union, which Malta joined in 2004. “Over my dead body will my children be stuck on these rocks,” she told Politico.
_______________________________________________________________
Bibliography
Chan, Sewell. “Investigative Journalist in Malta Is Killed in Car Bombing.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 16 Oct. 2017, <www.nytimes.com/2017/10/16/world/europe/daphne-caruana-galizia-journalist-malta.html>.
_______________________________________________________________
Response
The audience of this article is most likely the educated part of the population as much of the wording and sentence complexity is of a higher level than what would be directed towards a population without much education. Because the news agency is primarily directed towards New York citizens the audience would be expected to be fairly urban in nature and to understand more of the importance of freedom of press as they experience this freedom more often on a day to day basis. I think that the audience is also more of a younger group, possibly younger than 30's, as the younger generation would be more enraged and called to action about a lack of freedom where a older generation may be more complacent and have a more 'suck it up' type mentality.
The author of the article, as a journalist, is most likely biased against the government in Malta relating to the journalist who was killed and blaming the government for not doing enough to prevent it. As such, the purpose of the author in writing this article is most likely to increase awareness about the lack of freedom of speech in some countries and to incite some anger in the audience in hopes that over time the mentality behind this freedom would change in that it is not a guaranteed freedom everywhere but one that must be fought for.

Personally, I agree with the author of the article, as I think most would, that this bombing is a clear atrocity and deliberate mocking of those who desire freedom of speech. This journalist was clearly speaking out against various leaders of her country working on exposing some of the misconducts she observed in the nation and was clearly well known for her dislike of corruption and her willingness to speak out against it. At the same time, however, I feel that the author may have overstepped her intentions of exposing the evils in her country and begun to resort to a sort of rabble raising that was not as effective in honestly informing the public. When I look at her website, I see that the articles are all presented with a blatantly obvious bias against the government. She uses very loaded, trigger words and is clearly speaking to a population consisting mainly of an uneducated population. I feel that, while the bombing was still clearly unnecessary, she was not honestly presenting her case in the fairest way to the government. 

Comments

Post a Comment